Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Holly A.J.'s avatar

I read this for the first time a couple of years ago and noticed how unlike popular culture portrayals of Frankenstein the book is - no lair-like lab where a mad scientist laughs maniacally over his creation, no bolts of electricity animating an assembled corpse. The book is actually much stranger than the familiar pop-culture caricature. Shelley's literary style has more in common with the writing of Austen and the Brontes, and her portrayals of domesticity are familiar to anyone who has read 19th century novelists. So the contrast is all the more stark in the scenes of desolation whenever the creature makes an appearance.

Expand full comment
J. Tullius's avatar

It’s more fun to read it as a prototype of The Talented Mr. Ripley, where there really is no monster except Victor himself whose incapacity to establish meaningful relationships manifests in closeted sexual frustration and homicidal reactions to recurrent shame. Otherwise, after some 17 years of teaching this novella, I’d have to admit it’s amateurish and overwrought, yet so emblematic of the zeitgeist and its contemporary analogues that it has become a must-read in spite of its deficiencies.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts