26 Comments

Readers of Spenser's Faerie Queene, a great favorite of Lewis's, will find a likely origin of his method in the Narnian books. Spenser freely mingles Classical and Northern European mythology and folklore, and elements of Western history. As for the Calormenes, they are "Paynims," idolaters.

Lewis writes enjoyably about Spenser in Selected Literary Essays ("On Reading 'The Faerie Queene'" is a good one to start with), a portion of English Literature in the 16th Century, and, for last, Spenser's Images of Life.

I'm afraid that, where the FQ is taught at all any more, teachers burden the student with bosh about "critical lenses" of postcolonialism, gender issues (Britomart!), etc. and allusions by Spenser to contemporary politics. For most readers these are not good ways to make acquaintance with this poem, which should be read largely for pleasure. Anyway that's what I aimed at when I taught Book I, using the very reader-friendly edition published by Canon Press, Fierce Wars and Faithful Loves. There is wisdom there that doesn't require the tools of today's scholarship to perceive.

Lewis said ideally one would meet the FQ as a young person in a copiously illustrated edition. Get hold of the Dover paperback of Walter Crane's drawings for the FQ and enjoy them as you read Spenser.

Expand full comment

Yes, great example!

Expand full comment

I also was introduced to Spenser through Fierce Wars and Faithful Loves as a 7th grader. As an adult I picked up a collection containing the entirety of the first 2 books and selections from the rest, and I read that this year. Definitely will be finding complete versions of the rest to read in the near future! And I hope they will be illustrated. 😄

Expand full comment

This info is kind of a relief to me, actually. When I moved to London in my 20's to work among "people of the East" (the East End of London, actually, but also originally much much further East), I reread both Narnia, and I remember being stunned at the glimpses of culture I was encountering in real life, especially in the Horse and His Boy. But I was also disquieted that it seemed like most of that cultural/literary borrowing got applied to Narnia's "villains." I'm rather happy for the revelation that some of those Eastern literary devices, etc, were also woven into the Narnian Paradise and other places. (And I did know about the name Aslan. That always helped!)

Expand full comment

Wow. That’s a helpful glimpse of how this stuff manifest in the real world. Thanks for sharing.

Expand full comment

Always happy to share stories! 😊

Expand full comment

For me, Lewis's genius was his ability to take so many different legends and traditions and show how they inevitably pointed to the truth of Christianity. "For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face."

Expand full comment

He could bring all things back to the center.

Expand full comment

One year as a fourth-grade teacher, I read the entire Narnia series to my class, because it was all they wanted to hear. I think now it is time to reread it just for myself. I’ve forgotten so much.... great article, Joel. Thanks.

Expand full comment

It’ll be like finding Easter eggs in every chapter.

Expand full comment

I especially love Lewis’s statement, “A man writing a story is too excited about the story itself...” That reminds me that writing is best undertaken as a joy. Many an author has said they are glad “to have written” a work, but fewer are those who can say they truly reveled in and relished the process itself.

Expand full comment

I do love writing (and editing). I sort of think of it like an elaborate problem-solving exercise. It’s mostly fun most of the time.

Expand full comment

Lewis's statement probably struck me because more often than not I struggle in this regard; i love having crafted a story well in the aftermath, but during the crafting I relate more to Hemingway's quip that writing is easy; all one must do is sit before a typewriter and bleed.

Expand full comment

It’s probably because I’m writing nonfiction. What little fiction I’ve written has been harder—though I do have 20K words of a crime novel I started forever ago. I stopped because I needed to work on a paying project and got turned off by one of my characters. But those 20K words were so much fun to write.

Expand full comment

Ah, right. These days I mostly write 1,800-word nonfiction profiles for a magazine (in addition to some book-related writing among many editing projects). Interviewing the subjects and piecing together their stories is, as you say, something of a problem-solving exercise, or a jigsaw puzzle, which can be exasperating at times. But when the elements eventually come together, the satisfaction is rich. [https://cityviewmag.com/author/philnewman/]

Expand full comment

These are great, Phil!

Expand full comment

Thanks Joel. Insightful and interesting as always. I am feeling a need to revisit Lewis at some point. It has been a few years.

Expand full comment

He’s usually close by for me, mostly his essays and literary criticism. I enjoy dipping in an out of those from time to time. But it’s been years now since reading the Narnia books. Ball’s book definitely makes me want to give them another pass. If I do, I’ll probably audiobooks. I did that with my kids about 15 years ago. It was great because they have different actors read each book—e.g., Patrick Stewart handles The Last Battle.

Expand full comment

The real difference between Lewis and Tolkien is that Tolkien is Le Morte d'Arthur and. C.S. Lewis is Orlando Furioso. One is the totality that has every detail from the beginning even if it is not in the author's mind to put it in the novel. The other one is a potpourri of tales mixed together and has a hidden meaning in the Bible. Some people don't like the fact that people who don't accept the Bible except CS Lewis, but that is their problem because CS Lewis admitted that others who don't accept the underlying principle can read it as an allegory. (Yes, I know that's a long sentence - Sosumi)

Expand full comment

Good description.

Expand full comment

I have. spent a long time with both.

Expand full comment

I loved the Narnia books when I was a child, and later as an adult when I began to understand the meaning in the stories he was weaving from so many threads. Do you know Katherine Langrishe's book 'From Spare Oom to War Drobe'? It's a fascinating read, where, accompanied by her nine year old self, she revisits and re-analyses Lewis's motivation, intention and possible sources. It's a delightful book. Here's a link. https://www.katherinelangrish.co.uk/books/from-spare-oom-to-war-drobe-travels-in-narnia-with-my-nine-year-old-self/

Expand full comment

I always thought the bird on the tree was a phoenix, another recurring bird of various mythologies. I enjoyed Lewis's magpie fantasy in Narnia and understood it because, in my child brain, I liked to combine all my favourite fairytales too.

[N.B. Tolkien, for all he deplored Lewis's recombinant Narnia, did the same borrowing and recombining with Middle Earth - the stealing of the cup and the ensuing dragon wrath in The Hobbit are found in the Firedrake section of the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf, while the wearer-destroying Ring of Power, the tragedy of the children of Hurin, and the romances between immortal Elf and mortal Human all have parallels in the eleventh century High German Nibelungenlied.]

The Tree of Life is nearly universal in mythology, from the Ygddrasill of the Norsemen to the Anishinaabe Nation in North America: https://nativecanadianarts.com/gallery/tree-life-jjacko/. After all, the Tree not only appears in Genesis, but also in Revelation.

Expand full comment

Loved this.

Expand full comment

This is so interesting. I think the best writing is informed by the author's own absorption of his reading, and so often it draws on the archetypes that constantly pop up in myth and traditional stories. Reading such a book is enriching because in it you see reflections of the same archetypes that crop up in your own imagination. A great book or poem is a multi-faceted diamond, each face showing a new insight, which is why every time you read it you get some other insight from it.

Expand full comment

Do you by chance recall the source for the Seneca quote? From one of his letters or essays?

Expand full comment