36 Comments

'I think we often don’t know what has been most formative in our own lives, sometimes until the very end.'

This is such an important insight in a world in which life hacks and convenience are over-valued, and what's new is often fetishized at the expense of the old (often to generate profit/likes/innovation/engagement - all four of which deserve inverted commas).

I also like the idea of 're-enchantment' - it was hard enough to maintain enchantment when we spent more time in nature than in a death-scroll. The thing is now urgent.

Thank you for making the effort to record and post this interview, Joel. It came at a good time for me.

Expand full comment

Thanks for reading, Christopher. I agree regarding re-enchantment. We’ve engineered the mystery out of life and are poorer for it—not to mention increasingly incapable of dealing with it.

Expand full comment

I read this book many years ago, and you might find it, well... enchanting:

The Uses of Enchantment https://www.nytimes.com/1976/05/23/archives/the-uses-of-enchantment.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

The reviewer is Updike..

Expand full comment

Excellent. Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment

Can you send to Luke Burgis? It might be useful to him also. Best wishes, Chris

Expand full comment

Yes!

Expand full comment

The most interesting thing he talked about was liberating the humanities from higher education. If that happens, it would be revolutionary.

Expand full comment

Yes, I find that line of thinking fascinating as well.

Expand full comment

Agreed, this is a thrilling vision. The humanities were not primarily lodged in an academic setting even 100 years ago. There’s no reason they should be in the future. The universities have been poor custodians of the humanities, and liberating them would be a huge step forward.

Expand full comment

Contarini, huge step forward?

Expand full comment

Yes, absolutely. What we have now is the moral, intellectual, and spiritual foundations of our civilization are captive to a bunch of vicious imbeciles, who hold university positions, and devote their lives to destroying the minds, heart and souls of our young people, and stripping out the foundations of our civilization. I just read a terrific book by Francine Prose, she mentions starting out in a graduate humanities program and quickly understanding that the people there were not interested in the things that she’d love about literature. she escaped in time. Many people aren’t so lucky.

Expand full comment

Agree.

Academia is propaganda.

Expand full comment

This was thought-provoking. Thank you!

Expand full comment

My pleasure!

Expand full comment

This photo looks dangerous

Expand full comment

We’re all teetering between one thing or another :)

Expand full comment

Heh, dangerous?

Expand full comment

Can’t wait for Burgis’ next book! Also love the three city paradigm; yet I’ve often wondered about a fourth city - where the lens is entirely driven by power over other men/women in service to re-engineering society/ even humanity ie., from DC to CCP in varying degrees… haven’t thought it through though…

Expand full comment

Please do. The best thing we can do with ideas is add to them.

Expand full comment

I wonder if Walter Wink's "Domination System" is germaine to your idea?

Expand full comment

I don’t know about it. Post a link?

Expand full comment

Wink's trilogy Naming, Unmasking, and Engaging the Powers is where he spells it all out. JR Woodwards recent book The Scandal of Leadership is a good place to start bc he weaves together Girard and Wink.

Expand full comment

That "Three City" conceit is really terrific. Although I'd argue Athens and Jerusalem did come to a sort of detente, starting with Aquinas in his jail cell dusting off Aristotle.

Silicon Valley took Nietzche's half-formed, unpublished ideas in The Will to Power (and some others) and turned them into their own religion. Sounds like Burgis grew disillusioned with that way of life, and looked elsewhere.

One major thread I saw running through his commentary was what seemed like genuine intellectual humility. That's in short supply among the successful entrepreneur set from what I see. So I applaud him.

Expand full comment

Silicon Valley is a product of California, which has its own worldview. I talk about that here: https://www.millersbookreview.com/p/joan-didion-california-dream?utm_source=publication-search

I’m glad you noticed the humility. I think that’s right about Burgis. I get the sense that he’s always learning. He’s an inspiration that way.

Expand full comment

Silicon Valley feels like an accidental entity in modern California- anomaly even. The values couldn’t be more at odds. And in modern times especially, the entrepreneur whose sole focus is building, often feels compelled to pay lip service to the wokerrati/left (that runs CA) so they’ll leave him/her alone. Unfortunately the SV entrepreneur abandons the battlefield of moral/ethical dilemmas and conversations at his peril …

Expand full comment

I agree. It's why I am listening to Burgis. But staying cautious of mimetic rivalry 😜

Expand full comment

Grateful for this interview.Please ask him to publish the paper he wrote about till we have faces. I too am reading it again. Perhaps the One book I have read multiple times

Expand full comment

Yes! I want to read that too!

Expand full comment

I’m almost done with “Wanting” and have loved the book. So rich with insight, so compelling and helpful. And this interview was a wonderful compliment to that experience. Thanks for hosting it! 👌👌👌

Expand full comment

My pleasure! I found Wanting so rich and thoughtful.

Expand full comment

Another fascinating interview. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Russell!

Expand full comment

Fascinating

Expand full comment

Thanks! Agreed!

Expand full comment

This is an exceptional interview. I wasn’t expecting to be so swept up. A very pleasant surprise. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 17
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks, George! I found that compelling too. It’ll be interesting to see what comes of it.

Expand full comment