Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Holly A.J.'s avatar

I don't know if I have the courage to read it, but I understand the need for it to be written. As for the question of whether it should be read in schools, the vast majority of adolescents in history have had to grow up much faster than modern Western teens. My great grandmother was hired out as a domestic servant by age twelve. Twelve or thirteen was the age working class children entered servitude or were indentured as apprentices, which meant living away from home and working all day for six and a half days a week. They saw plenty of the grit of life. My great grandmother's friend and later sister-in-law, also a teen in domestic service, became pregnant out of wedlock, twice - we do not know who the fathers were but we do know her mother defended her when her father shunned her. The post-war Western cultural development of a leisurely and sheltered adolescence is a temporary and isolated socio-economic phenomena in the long history of the world.

Expand full comment
Jason A Clark's avatar

"Banned" books are not actually banned, just for the record. Any book anyone chooses to read can be easily and cheaply found in public libraries, bookstores, Amazon, etc. I mention this only because it was brought up as part of the review and the discussion of the book.

When people argue that a book should be made available to children in school they aren't arguing that the book should be available to THEIR children (because they can easily acquire the book for their own child to read), they are arguing that the book should be made available to MY child and YOUR child.

I agree that these decisions should be made at the local level because they know and are answerable to the local population and parents.

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts